Damping by resonant absorption in a partially ionized prominence plasma was studied by Soler et al. (2009d), who integrated both mechanisms in a non-uniform cylindrical prominence thread model in order to assess their combined effects. Partial ionization is relevant for the damping of short wavelength fast waves (Forteza et al., 2007), while resonant damping of kink waves is efficient whenever a transverse density inhomogeneity is present. The question arises on whether partial ionization affects the mechanism of resonant absorption and vice versa.
The model adopted by Soler et al. (2009d) has the magnetic and density structuring of the models used in Section 5.3 (see Figure 50), but the plasma properties are also characterized by the ionization fraction, . The radial behaviour of the ionization fraction in threads is unknown, so Soler et al. (2009d) assumed a one-dimensional transverse profile akin to the one employed to model the equilibrium density. The thread ionization fraction, , is considered a free parameter and the corona is assumed to be fully ionized, so . The non-uniform transitional layer of thickness therefore connects two plasmas with densities and and ionization degrees and . Soler et al. (2009d) used the one-fluid approximation and, for simplicity, the limit, which excludes slow waves. The quantities , and are here functions of the radial direction.
Soler et al. (2009d) first considered resonant damping in combination with Cowling’s diffusion and excluded Hall’s dissipation. They derived the following approximate expression for the damping ratio over the period, under the thin boundary approximation,et al. (2009d) performed a simple calculation by considering , and . This results in for a fully ionized thread () and for an almost neutral thread (). Thus, this approximate expression suggests that the ratio depends very slightly on the ionization degree, suggesting that resonant absorption dominates over Cowling’s diffusion.
The analytical estimates described above can be verified and extended by numerically solving the full eigenvalue problem. This approach allowed Soler et al. (2009d) to additionally include Hall’s diffusion in addition to ohmic and Cowling’s dissipation. In their study, these authors first considered a configuration with an abrupt density variation across the thread boundary (that is, ), which prevents resonant absorption from working. Next, they included the thin transitional layer between the thread and the corona, so that both resonant absorption and ion-neutral effects are at work.
For a homogeneous thread (), Soler et al. (2009d) computed the damping rate for different ionization degrees (see Figure 53). In agreement with the results displayed for the kink mode in Figure 49, has a maximum at the transition between the ohmic-dominated regime, which is almost independent of the ionization degree, to the region where Cowling’s diffusion is more relevant and the ionization degree has a significant influence. The approximate analytical solution for a given value of agrees very well with the numerical solution in the region where Cowling’s diffusion dominates, while it significantly diverges from the numerical solution in the region where ohmic diffusion is relevant. Within the range of typically reported wavelengths, is between 1 and 2 orders of magnitude larger than the measured values, so neither ohmic nor Cowling’s diffusion can account for the observed damping time.
For the inhomogeneous thread case (), Figure 54a displays some relevant differences. First, the damping time is dramatically reduced for intermediate values of , which include the region of typically observed wavelengths. In this region, the ratio becomes smaller as is increased, a behaviour consistent with damping by resonant absorption. The inclusion of the inhomogeneous transitional layer removes the smaller critical wavenumber and consequently the kink mode exists for very small values of . Figure 54a also shows a very good agreement between the numerical and the approximate solutions, this one given by Equation (33), for wavenumbers above , and a poor agreement in the range for which ohmic diffusion dominates, below . To understand this behaviour one has to bear in mind that the analytic approximate solution includes the effects of resonant absorption and Cowling’s diffusion, but not the influence of ohmic diffusion. Such as shown in Figure 54b, the ionization degree is only relevant for large wavenumbers, where the damping rate significantly depends on the ionization fraction through ohmic diffusion.
Figure 55 displays the ranges of for which Cowling’s and Hall’s diffusion dominate. Hall’s diffusion is irrelevant in the whole range of studied by Soler et al. (2009d), while Cowling’s diffusion dominates the damping for large . In the whole range of relevant wavelengths, resonant absorption is the most efficient damping mechanism and the damping time is independent of the ionization degree, as predicted by the analytical result (Equation ). On the contrary, ohmic diffusion dominates for very small . In this region, the damping time related to Ohm’s dissipation becomes even shorter than that due to resonant absorption, which means that the kink wave is mainly damped by ohmic diffusion.
Motivated by the spatially damped propagating waves observed by Terradas et al. (2002) (see Section 3.6.3), the spatial damping of linear non-adiabatic magnetohydrodynamic waves in a homogenous, unbounded, magnetized, and fully ionized plasma was studied by Carbonell et al. (2006). The spatial damping in a flowing partially ionized plasma has been studied by Carbonell et al. (2010). Carbonell et al. (2006) found that the thermal (fast) wave shows the strongest (weakest) spatial damping. For periods longer than 1 s the spatial damping of magnetoacoustic waves is dominated by radiation, while at shorter periods the spatial damping is dominated by thermal conduction. Therefore, radiative effects on linear magnetoacoustic slow waves can be a viable mechanism for the spatial damping of short period prominence oscillations, while thermal conduction does not play any role. On the other hand, Carbonell et al. (2010) found that in the presence of a background flow, new strongly damped fast and Alfvén waves appear whose features depend on the joint action of flow and resistivity. The damping lengths of adiabatic fast and slow waves are strongly affected by partial ionization, which also modifies the ratio between damping lengths and wavelengths. For non-adiabatic slow waves, the unfolding in both wavelength and damping length induced by the flow allows efficient damping for periods compatible with those observed in prominence oscillations. In the case of non-adiabatic slow waves and within the range of periods of interest for prominence oscillations, the joint effect of both flow and partial ionization leads to efficient spatial damping of oscillations. For fast and Alfvén waves, the most efficient damping occurs at very short periods not compatible with those observed in prominence oscillations.
Using the same equilibrium model as in Soler et al. (2009d) (see Figure 50), whose results have been presented in Section 5.4.1, Soler et al. (2011) investigated the spatial damping of propagating kink MHD waves in transversely non-uniform and partially ionized prominence threads. The damping mechanisms are resonant absorption and ion-neutral collisions (Cowling’s diffusion). In the absence of transitional layer, i.e., when the damping is due to Cowling’s diffusion exclusively, the non-dimensional wavelength, the damping length, , and the ratio of the damping length to the wavelength are displayed in Figure 56. Regarding the wavelength, we see that the effect of Cowling’s diffusion is only relevant for periods much shorter than those observed (1 – 10 min, corresponding to , with the thread Alfvén travel time). On the other hand, an almost neutral plasma, i.e., , has to be considered to obtain an efficient damping and to achieve small values of the damping ratio within the relevant range of periods. Such very large values of are probably unrealistic (Labrosse et al., 2010).
For resonantly damped modes, Figure 57 shows the results for different values of the thickness of the layer and fixed ionization degree. Figure 58 displays the results for different values of the ionization degree and a fixed transverse inhomogeneity length scale. Since the wavelength is not affected by the value of and has the same behaviour as in Figure 56a, both Figures 57 and 58 focus on and . Depending on the period, two different behaviours of the solutions are obtained. For short periods, the damping length is independent of the layer thickness and is governed by the value of the ionization degree. On the contrary, for large periods, the damping length depends on the value of , but is independent of the ionization degree. This result indicates that resonant absorption dominates the damping for large periods, whereas Cowling’s diffusion is more relevant for short period oscillations. In addition, we can observe that the approximate transitional period for which the damping length by Cowling’s diffusion becomes shorter than that due to resonant absorption is much lower than the typically observed periods. This shows that resonant absorption is the dominant damping mechanism in the relevant range. The analytical approximation for the damping ratio obtained by Soler et al. (2011) provides an accurate description of the kink mode spatial damping in the relevant range of periods, such as shown by the diamonds in Figures 56 and 57.
For typically reported periods of thread oscillations, resonant absorption is an efficient mechanism for the kink mode spatial damping, while ion-neutral collisions have a minor role. Cowling’s diffusion dominates both the propagation and damping for periods much shorter than those observed, while resonant absorption could explain the observed spatial damping of kink waves in prominence threads.
Living Rev. Solar Phys. 9, (2012), 2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.