6.2 Model studies of the influence of varying UV in the middle atmosphere
In Section 2.3 the thermal response of the stratosphere/troposphere to solar variability was shown to be
largest near the tropical stratopause with lobes of warming in the sub-tropics in the lower stratosphere and
bands of warming through mid-latitudes in the troposphere. One route to understanding this structure is to
see if it can be reproduced in atmospheric models.
Figures 35 and 36 show zonal mean temperatures from various atmospheric GCMs in which changes to
UV irradiance corresponding to the 11-year cycle variability have been imposed. In Figure 35 ozone changes
have been prescribed, so that there is no feedback between the solar heating and ozone which might
influence temperatures (and also circulation and winds). All these models show a similar temperature
response with greatest warming near the stratopause, stretching across most latitudes. Figure 36 shows
results from a model with a coupled chemistry scheme so that feedbacks between chemistry, radiation
and dynamics are allowed. Here the upper stratospheric warming is more concentrated at low
latitudes and there is a suggestion of a vertical structure more reminiscent of those shown in
Figure 14.
A comparison between satellite observations and model predictions for the solar cycle signal in zonal
mean ozone concentration is presented in Figure 37. The models include older 2D studies, which have good
representations of photochemical and radiative processes but poor representation of transport, and more
recent 3D coupled chemistry-climate simulations. The profiles retrieved from satellite data suggest
maximum fractional change in the upper stratosphere, a minimum near 30 km (especially in
the tropics) and possibly a second maximum below. All the models, however, predict a peak
near 40 km with a monotonically decreasing signal below. The observational data are only
available over less than two solar cycles, so there remains some doubt about the statistical
robustness of the signals derived from them, and Lee and Smith (2003) have suggested that
the 30 km minimum may be a mixing of the solar signal with one due to the quasi-biennial
oscillation.
A recent intercomparison of coupled chemistry climate models (Austin, 2007) suggests that this may be
true for short model runs but finds that the mid-stratospheric minimum can be reproduced in simulations
which include time-varying solar irradiance and prescribed sea surface temperatures. These differ from the
3D models in Figure 37 which used fixed solar max/min scenarios with climatological SSTs. Austin (2007)
argue that the transience in the simulations allows better reproduction of the mean meridional
circulation of the stratosphere and thus the transport of lower stratospheric ozone. Nevertheless,
another state-of-the-art coupled chemistry climate model, with very high vertical resolution
(Schmidt and Brasseur, 2006) does reproduce the vertical structure with time-slice (i.e. not
transient) runs. The response of stratospheric ozone to solar variability remains an active topic of
research.