|
There is still a controversial discussion going on about the nature of the respective shocks causing the
radio bursts. Cliver and some colleagues (Cliver et al., 1999, 2004; Cliver, 1999) argue that both the
metric and the kilometric burst are produced by CME-driven shocks. The opposing position is held, e.g.,
by Cane and Reames (1988); Gopalswamy et al. (1998); Cane and Erickson (2005
). They argue that the
metric radio bursts stem from coronal shock waves driven by flares as blast waves, as suggested before by,
e.g. Wagner and MacQueen (1983) or Sheeley Jr et al. (1984). In fact, there is never a continuous
spectrum seen connecting the metric and the kilometric radio ranges. This gap had often been assigned to
instrumental shortcomings. Only recently, the whole spectral range could be covered, but the gap in the
spectrum usually remains. Most metric type II bursts appear to die out within 2 Rs (from Sun center)
since their frequency rarely drops further than 5 MHz. This suggests that they are driven by
shock waves that die out soon. On the other hand, a CME driven shock cannot be formed
unless the CME speed exceeds the local Alfvén speed. For a majority of the slower CMEs
this stringent condition is not fulfilled before the CMEs reach a distance of several Rs (Mann
et al., 2003
). That would explain why the kilometric radio bursts rarely have frequencies above
1 MHz. In some cases, both radiation types are seen simultaneously at different frequencies.
That does not necessarily prove the simultaneous existence of 2 shocks. There might as well be
one large shock front that manages to accelerate electrons at very different distances from the
Sun.
The controversy is still open. The interested reader may wish to look up, e.g. Kahler (1992
); Gopalswamy
et al. (2005a); Cane and Erickson (2005); Reiner et al. (2005) and other articles by these
authors and others such as Mann, Klassen, Reames, Kaiser, Webb, to be found using the NASA
http://www.adsabs.harvard.edu/.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2006-2 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |