Many space physics applications are modeled as a magnetized plasma with at least one boundary
where the field’s normal component
does not vanish. (The surface normal
will herein be
defined to point inward, toward the plasma, rather than outward as other conventions might have it.) The
solar corona is the prototypical case, with its lower boundary at the denser layers of the atmosphere. In the
simplest coronal models these layers are combined into a single mathematical surface and given
the catch-all name “photosphere”. Models of the low corona consider the corona unbounded
from above, while some more global models, most notably Source Surface Models (Altschuler
and Newkirk Jr, 1969
; Schatten et al., 1969
, discussed in more depth in Section 8 of this
review), include a computational upper boundary to the corona, which the field also crosses.
Models of the heliospheric field generally take same source surface as their inner boundary
and extend outward to infinity. The present section introduces some basic concepts common
to all field models with at least one boundary, but will often refer specifically to the coronal
case.
Field lines intersecting the photospheric boundary are said to be anchored and the point of intersection is termed a footpoint. Field lines anchored at both ends to the photospheric boundary are said to be closed9. Closed field lines appear to account for the majority of an active region’s corona. Open field lines, such as in coronal holes, are those with one footpoint in the photosphere and the other end in the source surface or extending to infinity. To interpret the term “open” in cases of real magnetic field lines we recall the physical significance of field line topology discussed in Section 2.2. A field line is open for all practical purposes if it does not return to the photosphere within the mean-free path of high-energy electrons (so no diagnostic could detect its other end) or if it extends beyond the radius of super-Alfvénic solar wind speeds, outside of which dynamical perturbations propagate only outward. A footpoint can have dynamical as well as topological significance. We will draw this distinction by hereafter distinguishing between the concepts of anchoring and line-tying. Anchoring, as just described, refers only to the topology of the field line: It ends at a boundary. This is contrasted to line-tying, where the footpoint is assumed to either remain motionless or to move in a prescribed manner - prescribed independent of the field. According to this usage a field line remains anchored even if its footpoint moves in an unspecified manner across the photosphere. Unfortunately, the literature seems to use these two terms interchangeably, and often fails to distinguish between the topological and dynamical aspects of footpoints. Since the present review is primarily concerned with topology, it becomes necessary to modify the terminology in order to make this important distinction.
A natural reason to consider the photosphere as the lower boundary of the coronal magnetic field is
that magnetographs provide spatially resolved measurements at that particular surface. It is
beyond the scope of this review to discuss details of the various polarimetric schemes for making
magnetograms10.
Our purpose will be adequately served by assuming that with a magnetogram it is possible to deduce the
field’s normal component,
, over some portion of the photospheric surface. Many of the
widely-used magnetographs measure only the component along the line of sight which matches the vertical
only at the center of the solar disk. In these cases the normal field
can be derived only after making
assumptions about the field’s actual direction. These assumptions become increasingly questionable near
the solar limb where the line-of-sight and the vertical become orthogonal to one another. For
this reason it is customary to find
from line-of-sight measurements only away from the
limb.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2005-7 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |