Recently, Nakariakov et al. (2004b) modelled the evolution of a
coronal loop in response to an impulsive energy release and demonstrated that the second standing acoustic
harmonics appears as a natural response of the loop to an impulsive energy deposition. Modelling the loop
as a 1D hydrodynamic system with nonlinearity, radiative damping, thermal conduction and accounting for
possible chromospheric up and down flows, it was demonstrated that the second harmonics is a common
feature of the loop evolution. Figure 15 shows typical time curves of the density and temperature at the
loop apex. The quasi-periodic behaviour is clearly seen in the apex density curve, which is consistent with
the mode structure
where is the wave amplitude. (The paper of Nakariakov et al., 2004b, contains a misprint, the factor
of two is missing from Equations (3) and (4)). The density perturbations have a maximum near the loop
apex, while longitudinal velocity perturbations have there a node.
Figure 15:
A typical response of a 1D loop to the flaring heat deposition near the apex. The
density curve demonstrates pronounced quasi-periodic pulsations associated with the second standing
acoustic harmonics.
The second standing acoustic mode may be responsible for quasi-periodic pulsation with periods in the
range which are often observed in flare light curves in radio and X-ray bands. The SUMER
oscillations mentioned above are likely to be associated with some other excitation mechanism, as only
a small fraction of SUMER oscillations are observed in association with solar flares (Wang
et al., 2003a). Traditionally, the acoustic wave interpretation has been excluded as the waves of these
periodicities were supposed to be highly dissipative in the hot plasma of flaring loops. However, the
numerical simulations performed by Nakariakov et al. (2004b), as well as the recently gained
abundant observational evidence of the presence of acoustic waves in the solar corona, suggest that
the observed periodicities can be associated with this mode. The decayless character of these
oscillations may be explained in terms of auto-oscillations: By the competition of the oscillation
energy losing by dissipation and the energy deposition to the oscillation, e.g., through thermal
over-stability.