Historical researches have shown that the Sun climbed out of the Maunder Minimum gradually, and
showing strongly asymmetric activity, with nearly all sunspots observed between 1670 and 1715 located in
the Southern solar hemisphere (see Ribes and Nesme-Ribes, 1993). This is the kind of pattern that is
readily produced by nonlinear modulation of two dynamo modes of comparable period but opposite parity
(cf. Figure 20
herein; see also Beer et al., 1998; Sokoloff and Nesme-Ribes, 1994). Then again, in the
context of an intermittency-based model, it is quite conceivable that one hemisphere can pull out of a
quiescent epoch before the other, thus yielding sunspot distributions compatible with the aforecited
observations in the late Maunder Minimum. Such scenarios, relying on cross-hemispheric coupling, have
hardly begun to be explored.
Another possible avenue for distinguishing between these various scenarios is the persistence of the
primary cycle’s phase through Grand Minima. Generally speaking, models relying on amplitude modulation
can be expected to exhibit good phase persistence across such minima, because the same basic cycle is
operating at all times (cf. Figure 20
). Intermittency, on the other hand, should not necessarily lead to
phase persistence, since the active and quiescent phases are governed by distinct dynamics. One noteworthy
exception to these expectations is the intermittent Babcock-Leighton solution presented in
Charbonneau et al. (2004), where the cycle’s phase can be sustained across Grand Minima, through
the regulating influence of meridional circulation. One can but hope that careful analysis of
cosmogenic radioisotope data may soon indicate the degree to which the solar cycle’s phase persisted
through the Maunder, Spörer, and Wolf Grand Minima, in order to narrow down the range of
possibilities.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2005-2 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |