Various mean-field-based dynamo models are known to support non-axisymmetric modes over a
substantial portion of their parameter space (see, e.g., Moss, 1999; Bigazzi and Ruzmaikin, 2004, and
references therein). At high
, strong differential rotation (in the sense that
) is known to
favor axisymmetric modes, because it efficiently destroys any non-axisymmetric component on a timescale
much faster than diffusive (
at high
, instead of
). Although it is not entirely clear
that the Sun’s differential rotation is strong enough to place it in this regime (see, e.g., Rüdiger and
Elstner, 1994), some 3D models do show this symmetrizing effect of differential rotation (see, e.g., Zhang
et al., 2003a).
While all poloidal field regeneration mechanisms considered above must rely on some break of
axisymmetry to circumvent Cowling’s theorem, some are of a fundamentally non-axisymmetric nature even
at the largest scales. This is the case with the
-effect based on both the buoyant instability of
toroidal magnetic flux tubes (see Section 4.7), and on the hydrodynamical shear instability in the
tachocline (see Section 4.5). In either cases stability analyses indicate that the most readily
excited modes have low azimuthal wave numbers (
or
). This is subsumed in an
axisymmetric dynamo model upon invoking azimuthal averaging, which amounts to assuming that
successive destabilization events are uncorrelated in longitude; if they are, however, then the
corresponding
-effect should be itself longitude-dependent, which is known to favor the excitation of
non-axisymmetric dynamo modes (see, e.g., Moss et al., 1991). This avenue should definitely be
explored.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2005-2 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |